Film Review: Inception
Christopher Nolan is currently on one of the greatest cinematic runs in the history of the medium. From his first feature, Following, he has gone on to make (in order) Memento, Insomnia, Batman Begins, The Prestige, The Dark Knight and now Inception. Even if Inception turned out to be a giant turkey, Mr. Nolan could still rest easy that his reputation is all but cast-iron at this point. Where this might breed complacency in some directors, it seems to only galvanise Nolan in the belief he has in his ideas and his films.
Inception is a hugely ambitious film. It’s also very much an auteur’s film, a film by Chris Nolan – it’s his vision from start to finish. Here, he has writtten, produced and directed a film that is, in his words, a “sci-fi actioner set within the architecture of the mind”. With a budget of $200 million. It has been a long time since Hollywood entrusted an auteur with that kind of cash, perhaps harking back to the era of learnt lessons that ended with Michael Cimino’s Heaven’s Gate. There is no such self-indulgence here however, but what we do have is a tightly-wound, cerebral, summer action blockbuster.
DiCaprio plays Dom Cobb, an extractor, who’s job it is to get inside the subconscious of his targets and extract ideas from them, but he has been extricated from his home in the U.S and is unable to return to his children. A shadowy indsutrialist offers him the chance to overturn his extradition as the fee for one last job – inception. This is the art of planting an idea into a target’s head rather than stealing one. Many in the business claim it is impossible, yet Cobb knows that it can be done. He accepts the deal and puts together a team to carry out the mission. The task requires to go extremely deep into the target’s subconscious, three dreams within dreams. The deeper they go, the more unstable the realities become.
The film begins in a bewildering fashion, quick cuts between what you later learn are different realities that completely boggle your mind. However, you just have to accept you are not going to understand some of what’s going on and cling to the bits you do. After that though, the film does slow down for a little section, and the complexity of the plot creates some necessities that are really the film’s only flaws. There is a necessity to establish motivations for the actions of a few characters and there is a necessity for Ariadne (Ellen Page) to have almost all her dialogue be exposition. However, the film moves with such an expert pace that you are never left long enough to question anything, you are too busy just keeping up with the action.
The idea of the shared dream that is central to this film is clearly about filmmaking itself, with Nolan the architect and we the dreamers. Certain elements of the set design in the early part of the film actually recall an empty soundstage, or a props workshop. And just like in filmmaking, the boss can’t go it alone, he needs to build a team of experts around him, whom he must rely on to reach the goal. In both cases, the teams assembled are the best in the business. DiCaprio’s Cobb has access to the very best extractors, architects and forgers in the business, and Nolan has assembled one of the greatest ensemble casts possible today while also attracting others at the very top of their game, with a soundtrack by Hans Zimmer, and cinematography by Wally Pfister.
The conceits that are littered throughout the plot in order to drive it forward are almost perfect in every case, each raising a little smile on your face as you finally get a hint of where the film will turn next. Many of these knots that are unravelled through the running time are excuses to create some of the wildest and most original visual effects ever seen on a cinema screen. The dream realities have no hard and fast rules of physics and can be manipulated by the architect at will. This means cities fold on top of themselves, freight trains run straight through city roads and a simple fistfight in a corridor becomes a breathtaking, inexplicable thrill ride.
Despite the complexity of the plot, the ambition of the effects and the pace of the cutting, the film never feels like its overstretching, or that anything hasn’t been thought through to it’s conclusion. Like any good sci-fi, it strictly obeys its own rules, even if you as a viewer don’t know what they are sometimes. The performances are remarkable too, Leo in particular having so much to balance on his expressions that it would confuse the audience in the hands of lesser actors. The fact that he had a character with such similar motivations and problems with reality in Shutter Island and has managed to distinctly differentiate between the two men is testament to his skill as an actor. The supporting cast are equally incredible, Marion Cotillard providing the menace but also the emotional heart of the film with Mal, the relationship between Tom Hardy’s Eames and Joseph Gordon-Levitt’s Arthur providing a little levity here and there, Ellen Page’s Ariadne doing remarkably well under the weight of all the exposition, not to mention Cillian Murphy, Tom Berenger and Michael Caine.
Inception is one of the most brain-teasing films to ever have been made with this kind of budget and scale of production. It is a return to the intelligent sci-fi of the seventies, before it was infantilised by the likes of Star Wars, but rather than the cold, studied detachment of that previous era, it is fascinated by the relationships between people and with themselves. The result is a film that can not only sit in the pantheon of the greatest sci-fi movies, but the greatest movies at all. As Leonardo DiCaprio put it in a recent interview, this is Nolan’s 8 1/2. A masterpiece.

Did you get an advanced screening? Mucho jealous. Very very excited about this one.
Tom Berenger.
I’ve come to the conclusion that Nolan makes clever and impressive films but he doesn’t seem able to attach any emotional depth or resonance to his work. I wanted to care about the characters in Inception but they all just seemed like conduits for the director’s (albeit brilliant) imagination. I like the idea of the dreams representing film itself (with jump cuts etc accepted by audiences in much the same way as the fragmentation of dreams) and I enjoyed the film for its creativity and technical achievements. But I couldn’t really connect with it. On a side note, I just rewatched The Beat That My Heart Skipped. Completely different genre, but Audiard could teach Nolan a thing or two about putting human emotion on screen.
PS I did like the film, I just think Christopher Nolan needs to branch out from his puzzle, puzzle, Michael Caine, clever revelation formula…
I tend to agree with Pat, both Insomnia and The Prestige suffer from a narrative less compeling than his other work and both films left my mind as soon as the film ended.
His other works have meticulously woven plots that tend to cover over the lack emotional involment in the characters, leaving me with the feeling like I’d just played through a Quantic Dream game.
He does them so damn well, i am not sure he needs to branch out. If he feels the need to extend his auteurism then so be it but in the mean time he is pretty damn exciting and bankable. Nolan, you have my love. Also i have to say i was pretty gripped narratively with Insomnia and The Prestige. Very different styles of narrative both done very well. I also think that with a lot of his films, the emotional residue is scrubbed away by the sheer awesomeness of his style and pacey storytelling. It is very much there, but perhaps thinly veiled. Call that an inability to create a connection between the characters and audience if you will fine sir. But Nolan is still learning and despite that, yet to make a bad film.
Also Tom Hardy is a tour de force. Olivier is probably a bit nervous. This guy strolls through the film. He is most definitely going to be the stand out actor of our generation. Sexy as fuck as well.
If anybody has a good link to a website in which i can get some of the suits worn by Mr Levitt, i would be much obliged to you.
Having watched it twice now, I was a bit overzealous with this review…
I would like to exchange links with your site. Is this possible?